The view from the sidelines on everything football. From what's on our TV screens to betting with rumours and Andy Johnson's dives along the way.

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Sunday's betting tips

Reading take on Spurs and Arsenal face Liverpool in the major clash of the weekend - but where should your money go?

Reading v Tottenham
A tough fixture schedule has yielded five losses in a row in all competitions - as expected - and Steve Coppell's side now face a rejuvenated Tottenham, in fine voice after beating Chelsea and then avoiding one of their usual banana skins against Port Vale in midweek.
Although the home side avoided a midweek match, so therefore should be fresher, momentum is a fine element to have flowing through your players, and Martin Jol is in prime position.
Reading's poor form may have affected their players more than is being let on, so a cheeky bet on the away side may be the answer. Tottenham are at 13/10, a draw is at 11/5 and a Reading victory at 9/5 (SportingOdds). It is a game best avoided, but those who wish to have a punt should go draw no bet on Spurs at 7/10.

Arsenal v Liverpool
Although many are predicting a home win at a far from generous 10/11, Liverpool are in dire need of something from the match (11/4). Arsenal have struggled at the Emirates Stadium, so a win for Arsene Wenger's side may not be as easy as planned.
This match-up brought wins for the home side in last season's two clashes; both times a late goal proving to be the winner. Liverpool were set for a point at Highbury in March before Xabi Alonso was sent off and captain Steven Gerrard offered Thierry Henry a free run at goal. A draw is at 11/5.
Wenger's fuming at West Ham and subsequent media ban may just tip the balance in this fixture towards Arsenal -- but again I would be inclined to go at draw no bet on the Gunners at 2/5.

Monday, November 06, 2006

Ronaldinho flops and flies

Shepherd's Bush held the FIFPro awards last year, and Ronaldinho's win that time was under no question or scrutiny. But after a sex-ravaged, PlayStation dominated German holiday and subsequent substandard outings for Barcelona, his retention of the crown, as voted for by fellow professionals, is surprising but not shocking.

The less learned players - aka the majority - will take little time in deciding their winner, while other will have switched on Sky Sports 3 and seen a Ronnie special in a lowly La Liga match, or perhaps Soccer AM's showboat was the deciding factor. Others will go by word of mouth. Or am I mistaken in this generalisation of some of the English players?!

No one can expect the players award to have much meaning or status - it is hard to pick out, from across Europe, the best player. The plaudits have not suddenly stopped for Ronaldinho, and he helped Barca to their Champions League crown and La Liga title last season.

But the belated revelation that Ronaldinho was heavier than his much-criticised compatriot Ronaldo at the World Cup explains, to a degree, his poor performances and is perhaps an indication that football is no longer at the forefront of his mind. While his ability is in tact, he will remain at Barcelona, but a move to Italy may not be far off if he desires greater wealth for less effort and pressure.

It summed up a good night for Barcelona as Lionel Messi won the Young FifPro Players' Player award and Samuel Eto'o the FifPro Merit Award, for speaking out against racism, although the purpose and validity of the award is dubious. For Messi, it is a much-deserved award for his outstanding dribbling ability, some of which was on show at the World Cup for Argentina. At only 19, what odds against him being the world's most valuable player in less than five years?

Zinedine Zidane made it into the world XI in spite of the ridiculous furore surrounding his dismissal, and the apparent want of some in football for that to be the only moment he will be remembered by.

I see he is an a new Adidas advert, and looking far happier than at any time on the pitch during his glittering career. It can't be the money - can it? Surely that comfortable sweatband...

Thursday, November 02, 2006

Footballing World - on Fox!

Filed under: Arsenal, Aston Villa, Blackburn, Bolton, Charlton, Chelsea, Everton, Fulham, Liverpool, Man City, Man Utd, Middlesbrough, Newcastle, Portsmouth, Reading, Sheffield Utd, Tottenham, Watford, West Ham, Wigan

Our very own Paul Angelo Sampson - writer of the regular 'Outsider' series on the main site - will be guest hosting a segment of Fox Soccer Channel's FC Fox on Friday night in the US at 19.30 Eastern time, and Footballing World will be featured both visually and orally - so watch it if you are able to.

Fox took a keen interest in his pieces for the site, and you can catch the latest one by clicking here.

So having read his work, you can now relax and watch Paul on TV!

Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Mourinho's passion and patience

Chelsea will have the luxury of finishing on top of their testing group after an enthralling but ill-tempered clash with Barcelona that left the eternally relaxed Frank Rijkaard raging at the helpless Stefano Farina, subjected to a similar level of simulation and dissent as with Portugal's bloodbath match-up with Holland at the World Cup.

The match two weeks ago witnessed a below par and uninspired Barcelona, ensuring life was relatively easy for the referee, but the 2-2 draw in Catalunya, which was lit-up by four special goals, will be remembered for ill-discipline and player power.

The visitors limited the European champions to just a handful of attempts on goal, but appeared to lack the 'winners' quality of taking their own under a terrifying atmosphere. Yet Chelsea came roaring out in the second half, and deservedly levelled with a Frank Lampard effort that cannot be doubted or criticised - it was a moment that will satisfy even the most hardened critics of his ability, although it is up to the player to replicate such efforts for country.

Heralded in some parts as the deflection king - many of his goals have derived from crucial deflections - Lampard lost control of a superb through pass from Michael Essien when one-on-one with Victor Valdes, but then let his feet, rather than his brain, take control. From the touchline, he audaciously chip-lobbed Valdes, with the ball clipping the post en route; the result was a stunning equaliser. 99% of times, even from the same player's foot, the ball would have been hit narrowly wide - but not this time.

However, Barcelona offered far more resistance than Chelsea's typical domestic opponents. Jose Mourinho became increasingly frustrated as his side failed to use their goal as a step for further pressure and a potential winner at the Camp Nou. Just six minutes later, and the harsh reality of facing a brilliant side touched Chelsea's players as Ronaldinho, for the first time, came to life and ran beyond Khalid Boulahrouz before offering Eidur Gudjohnsen a painless option to score.

Following claims of diving to win a penalty for Barcelona's in last weekend match with Recreativo Huelva - despite an obvious pull to his shirt - the Icelandic international, who is the acting replacement for the prolific Samuel Eto'o, wheeled away in delight. He was presented with an honour before the match at Stamford Bridge for his endeavours at Chelsea less than a fortnight ago, but Mourinho's derogatory comments appeared to reflect the hustling and unkind nature of modern-day football.

Gudjohnsen went off injured less than 20 minutes later with the belief that his goal would be enough to hand Barca an important victory.

Before Didier Drogba brought Mourinho to his knees, the outstanding tale of the evening had already taken form. The central protagonist was Rafael Marquez, the Mexican player (in all senses of the word), had already shoved Drogba to the ground before seemingly stamping on Essien's groin, Wayne Rooney style. He also formed the words of Mourinho's post-match interview when colliding with Claude Makelele - 'penalty' shouted the manager. But the claim was barely valid, with Marquez seeking to pullout of the challenge.

Ricardo Carvalho may have been guilty of a similar offence later on, but Uefa are set to avoid infuriating both camps further with intervention and bans on either player, especially bearing in mind the doubt over both players’ intentions when challenging. However, with Essien banned last season by Uefa on video evidence, Mourinho's paranoia will only grow.

Deco had set the path for a great contest when he weaved forward on the left flank and finished with aplomb. Mourinho recognised the tough job referees - like Farina - face, showing a greater amount of patience than with previous contentious moments. It is evident that his inaccurate rant at the ambulance services in the aftermath of the match with Reading, which has not been followed with a formal apology or greater interrogation, has had an effect on his words - at least in the short-term.

He vowed to watch the match again before criticising the referee's assumed bias towards the hosts, and he ought to concentrate on his team's grand resolve. Despite missing various opportunities, Chelsea refused to halt their efforts; Captain Fantastic was again the one who provided the precious contribution. A cushioned header allowed Drogba in, and he brilliantly turned Marquez - who attempted to fell him but ironically failed - to earn a point. The new and rejuvenated Ivorian forward is rapidly turning into a player who can independently alter matches. He leads the Champions League scoring charts.

It was a memorable moment, watching Mourinho celebrate with the passion of a player who has just scored a Lampard-esque goal. Sliding on his knees, his hate for Barcelona - a rather unambiguous fact now - was alleviated as the 96,000 fans fell silent. Having cried foul for every challenge, and certainly helping referee Farina into at least a couple minor decisions, the realisation that even qualifying for the first knockout stage - never mind beating their great rivals - would now be far from regulation.

Mourinho's relief was palpable and it was a psychologically huge result for the in-form English champions, now unbeaten in 13 matches. Rijkaard ran towards Farina, expressing disgust at the amount of stoppage time played - six minutes were displayed, but the final whistle was blown after only five. The referee was eager, understandably, to end a fractious affair. Nevertheless, the match assessor, despite an apparent good use of discretion, will mark him down.

It was petty from Rijkaard, who should have restrained himself when his side could easily have had players dismissed. Ten yellow cards reflected the night's turbulence, but both sides are odds-on to make the knockout rounds. They will be separated in the next round – but can meet again as early as the quarterfinals. For the majority of fans though, a meeting in the final would be the most tantalizing prospect.

Sunday, October 29, 2006

Fulham's 'repaired' defence a fallacy

Grey clouds dominated the scenery around Craven Cottage but Fulham's performance was the weather equivalent of a torrential rainstorm that began while walking without an umbrella.

It was low quality throughout, with the only goal of the match a prime example of why this would not enter the Premier League's Hall of Fame. With a penalty already missed, Henri Camara – the most impressive player – used his pace to force a comical error from the two Fulham defenders in front of him. His shot was powerful enough to hand Wigan a second consecutive win, their first away from home.

As a pessimistic Fulham fan, or in simpler terms, a Fulham fan, those that have praised the apparently reborn defence have not managed to pull the wool over these eyes. Ian Pearce has been the shining light, though. His fitness levels have been enhanced greatly over the close season, and that has been rewarded with a one-year contract extension.

But he and captain Zat Knight were torn to shreds in central defence by a team who were far more stimulated. Wigan utilised their height advantage and finer strength to expose Fulham's great deficiencies. The duo could not deal with Camara's extraordinary pace or Emile Heskey's elevation, nor the balls that were sprayed to each flank, allowing the wingers to run infield and cause consistent problems.

Liam Rosenior, in Chris Coleman's eyes, is playing well enough to keep Moritz Volz out of the right-back position but his passing was once again far from commendable in a relatively ineffective afternoon. Meanwhile Franck Queudrue was the main man at fault for the late winner: his poor attempted clearance was the gateway for a deserved victory.

Steed Malbranque scored the winner in last season's corresponding fixture, and his guile was missed terribly during a performance that lacked any inspiration. Luis Boa Morte's return – though only as a late substitute – scarcely altered the game, and it was only after the goal that the home side indicated why they were the original favourites for this clash.

Suddenly there was a frantic attempt to snatch a leveller, with Chris Kirkland forced into his only save of note.

The most common trait of Fulham's season to date is a slow start and the incredibly irritating obstinacy from the players that sees them only raise the tempo when the situation is dire – and this was the cause of their third defeat since August. Charges of inconsistency were accurately levelled throughout the preceding campaign, and although it is too early to say that it will be a feature this season, the symptoms were on exhibition to all.

There must have been a death wish from the Fulham players' perspective. Initially there was a failure to react to an ominous first half, with Coleman's maligned team-talks again failing to change the heavy tide at Fulham's goal. Then a moment when Wigan thought they had scored as the ball seemed to cross the line, followed quickly by yet another penalty giveaway – Knight with an arrogant elbow-ball which took the penalties conceded tally to no less than four, in 11 matches.

Yet the miss, despite the raucous cheering that ensued, failed to ignite a performance void of even a drop of petrol. Therefore, Wigan kept up their record of never having played out a 0-0 draw in the Premiership.

Is this simply a blip or the burst of the bubble formed on a mirage? That shampoo-formed bubble was created after the late bravado at St James' Park, the match in which Jimmy Bullard sustained his season-ending injury. His absence was not detrimental immediately, and even the five-week layoff of captain Boa Morte did not rock the ship. The latter has returned, but unless Fulham can string out results, Bullard's omission could be more destructive than ever feared, being a player who can generate something from nothing.

Fulham will continue to exasperate and lie in mediocrity – or at least my years at the Cottage have given me this unique sense of intuition. The points haul so far has been impressive, but a real opening to establish a place inside the top ten has been passed up. There is an immediate opportunity for reprieve with another home match on Saturday, but against in-form Everton. Nevertheless, a contest that was won last season and one that should represent a return to triumphant habits.

The final dampener that will be offered is this: on corresponding fixtures, Fulham are four points down from the 2005-06 campaign, despite sitting inside the top half. Apart from the games against Manchester United and Chelsea, the schedule has been kind. It does not mean that relegation is imminent or a top ten position by May is out of reach. However, it does denote home results will be essential and slip-ups at the Cottage must be infrequent, against the 'beatable' sides.

Reaching the magical segment of the table is an attainable objective, but not with performances akin to the one that triggered a defeat against lowly Wigan.

Friday, October 27, 2006

Kirkland ends his five years of frustration

Chris Kirkland, universally recognised as an immensely talented goalkeeper for several years, has finally ended his ill-fated five-year stint at Liverpool. After being signed for £6m back in 2001 by Gerard Houllier, Kirkland was never able to stay clear of injuries for a sufficient period of time to establish himself as the club’s number one.

Rafael Benitez quickly grew frustrated with Kirkland’s spout of injuries; by last summer, Kirkland had become fourth choice at Anfield and spent the season on loan at West Brom. He initially did well, before receiving an inevitable injury; the phenomenal form of Tomasz Kuszczak kept him out of the side thereafter.

Since joining Wigan on an initial loan deal in the summer, Kirkland has remained injury free and put together a run of eight consecutive Premiership games. In the process, he has forced his way into the England squad and, when appearing as a sub during England's 4-0 win over Greece, allowed his father to reap the rewards of placing a speculative bet on his son representing England when Kirkland was a child.

He is just 25 and, given the potential he possesses and the low fee Liverpool were demanding - around £1million, it was a surprise, in some ways, that no ‘bigger’ clubs made moves to sign him. But at Wigan he will be the main man and should be a guaranteed starter when fit. After several seasons treading water, Kirkland is back playing regular football. If his form is consistent and he keeps clear of the treatment table, then the notion of him becoming England’s new number one will be anything but risible.

Uefa left vulnerable with strong racist stance

Not many are backing Nikola Mijailovic over alleged racism towards Blackburn forward Benni McCarthy, in a case that has been subsequently resolved with a five-match ban for the defender from Uefa – who appear very keen to enforce their words lamenting racists in the game.

The Serbian defender, in spite of his reprimand, may deeply resent the claim that he is a racist person. What is said or done on the pitch is not usually a fair representation of a players’ character, such is the atmosphere and pressure on footballers to succeed. Needless to say, there is no excuse that reasons such behaviour.

Whatever the truth of the matter is, concerning Blackburn’s match in Poland at Wisla Krakow, Uefa’s hastiness in handing out a convincingly severe sentence with, apparently, no proof leaves the organisation open to challenge: from players, the CAS, and even courts of law.

Match referee Stefan Johannesson might have played an integral role in finding Mijailovic guilty, with Uefa stating, at the time of the complaint, that it would be very difficult to find compelling evidence: it would be one players’ word against another.

Uefa spokesperson William Gaillard admitted: "We have no reason to doubt Benni's word; he has been in the game for a long time now, playing at the top level. But the problem will be finding hard evidence to pass any sanctions."

The FA’s Adrian Bevington said: "Unfortunately we have seen the recent trend where, when our clubs have gone away in Europe or the national side has gone away, we've seen them encounter situations of racism."

Those that follow cricket will know all about the scandal surrounding umpire Darrell Hair’s personal decision over the state of a cricket ball – judging that it had been illegally tampered with by Pakistan and causing mass uproar in the process. He had no evidence to rely on, and is now set to depart the international stage as a result.

Therefore, unless the referee is certain he heard racist remarks, of which there has been no indication from Uefa, European football’s governing body has opted to have faith in McCarthy’s word – with no reason not to – and the five-game suspension backs this. But what will happen if Mijailovic appeals? Can and how will Uefa justify their verdict?

The Serb believes he is innocent: "Both of us were swearing but there was no racist abuse at all," the 24-year-old told Serbian newspaper Kurir. "Investigation will show I'm innocent, everything can be seen on tape." The tape is unlikely to reveal much that can close this case, and certainly not as blatantly as Marco Materazzi’s words to Zinedine Zidane during the World Cup final, which were interpreted across the world (albeit wrongly in most cases).

Materazzi was handed a two-match ban for ‘provocation’ rather than the actual remarks – a Fifa ruling that could hardly be contested.

McCarthy did complain at half-time to the referee, to aid his case, yet the taunts continued. Piara Powar, a spokesman for anti-racism campaigners Kick It Out, said: "It seems that Blackburn and other officials were able to produce eye-witness evidence, allowing action to be taken."

There was no question of a confrontation and verbal exchanges, but were specific racist insults heard or have Uefa decided that technicalities can no longer play a role when the racism trend is struggling to be curbed?

Mijailovic will now miss the rest of the Uefa Cup group stage, and a further two matches beyond that – likely to be in Wisla’s next European campaign after the home defeat to Blackburn. The Serb is well advised not to appeal and drag out the procedure, further sullying an already trashed reputation.

Should the ban stand, Uefa has sent out a welcome message. The times of meagre fines for associations (like the Spanish FA following the match with England) and inaction on complaints may be at an end. A ruthless stance has to be enforced in order for a consistent problem to be brought under greater control.

Uefa, though, must ensure that they can prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and remain pragmatic when dealing with these high-profile cases. In McCarthy’s case, this seems to have been implemented, and a further step has been taken in reducing racism in the game.

Thursday, October 26, 2006

Clock ticking for Flamini

Filed under: Arsenal

When your selection for a Carling Cup tie is met with general ambivalence by supporters, it is clear your Arsenal career is nearing an end. And that is the fate currently befalling Mathieu Flamini.

The combative Flamini is no bad player, of course. Indeed, he proved himself a surprisingly competent fill-in left-back last season in Arsenal’s tremendous run to the Champions League Final. But the end of his Arsenal career probably came when, at the start of the current campaign, he professed a reluctance to play there again, preferring to revert back to his previous position in the centre of midfield.

Flamini provides work-rate in abundance, energy and tenacity. In this respect, he has come close to filling the void created by Ray Parlour. But he palpably lacks the something special required; he is neither a playmaker nor a genuine holding player.

His versatility and enthusiasm have lead to comparisons with fellow Frenchman Gilles Grimandi; with the greatest respect to Grimandi, Flamini will take no pleasure from these. Since joining in 2004, he has proved himself a willing stand-in. But it seems that is no longer enough.

As well as first-teamers Gilberto, Cesc Fabregas and Tomas Rosicky, Arsenal have a host of other options in central midfield.

They have the ‘next Vieira’ Abou Diaby, who impressed greatly last season before getting injured. There is also 18-year-old Brazilian Denilson, who has the physique and footballing intelligence to be a tremendous success. Even Alexandre Song, so castigated last campaign, appears to be coming good.

With Diaby, Denilson and Song all appearing to possess far greater potential than the gutsy but limited Flamini, the Frenchman’s days at Arsenal seem nearing an end. After all the controversy following his move from Marseilles, it seems Flamini is simply not quite good enough to make the grade. Like compatriot Pascal Cygan, his willingness has never been in doubt, but, unless he is content with a role on the periphery, Arsenal will expect around £ 4million for his services come summer – or perhaps even January.